Esteemed Sigmund Freud,
I greet you with the profound contemplation and the mental rigor that accompanies any discourse on the divine, the infinite, and the mortal soul’s reckoning with the eternal. Your request for guidance through the prism of my wager—a philosophical proposition set forth during my earthly tenure in the 17th century—is a testament to the timeless nature of the questions that haunt human existence.
Allow me, if you will, to lay out the foundations of the wager that bears my name as I understand them, for they may serve to illuminate the path you seek in navigating the vast ocean of uncertainty that life presents.
At the heart of the human condition is a choice, a compulsory gamble that each soul must make, consciously or otherwise: to believe or not to believe in God. This choice is thrust upon us not by the whim of a capricious deity but by the very nature of our existence. We are creatures suspended between the finite and the infinite, between the known and the unknowable.
In considering this wager, we must first acknowledge that reason alone is insufficient to penetrate the veil of the divine. Reason, that noblest faculty of the mind, can lead us to the threshold of belief, but it is impotent to reveal the full countenance of God. Thus, we reach an impasse—a fork in the road of existence—where we must commit to one of two inherently uncertain propositions: God is, or God is not.
Let us then, as you are well acquainted with the depths of the human psyche, approach this problem not with the sterile detachment of logic but with the passionate urgency of life itself. We must wager. We cannot abstain, for to abstain is to choose, and in this game of cosmic stakes, not to decide is itself a decision.
Consider, my dear Freud, the asymmetry of the potential outcomes. If we wager that God exists and this belief aligns with reality, the rewards are infinite and utterly transcendent: an eternity of bliss and communion with the divine. If, on the other hand, we wager that God exists and are mistaken, our loss is finite—a life, perhaps, lived within the constraints of divine precepts that, even if ultimately unnecessary, may imbue our existence with order and purpose.
Conversely, if we wager that God does not exist and we are correct, our gain is finite—a life of autonomy, free from the strictures of faith. Yet, should we wager against the existence of God and find ourselves in error, the loss is infinite and irrevocable: an eternity bereft of God’s presence, an eternal severance from the source of all goodness.
In this analysis, the scales tip decidedly in favor of belief. The rational choice, when faced with a finite cost and an infinite potential gain, is to act as though God is. This is the essence of my wager; it is a matter of prudential judgement as much as it is a leap of faith.
Yet, I hear your counterpoint already, for it echoes through the corridors of time and the chambers of the human heart. What of those who cannot believe, who find their very nature in rebellion against the conception of a deity, or who are swayed by the manifold arguments against God’s existence? To you, and to them, I say this: Endeavor to convince yourself. Our inability to believe may stem as much from a lack of will as from a lack of evidence.
In this endeavor, we must be sincere. The path to belief is not one of self-deception or feigned piety; it is a path of openness to the possibility of the divine, a willingness to align one’s life with the precepts that point towards God, even in the absence of certainty. It is a process of cultivating faith as one might cultivate a garden—not with the expectation of immediate results but with the patience and hope that seeds, once planted, may yet flourish.
Dr. Freud, you who have delved into the inner workings of the mind with unmatched acuity, understand better than most the power of the unconscious and the subtle forces that govern belief. May you find in my words not a command to blind faith but an invitation to consider the existential ramifications of your philosophical stance.
In closing, I encourage you to weigh these matters with the gravity they deserve, for they bear upon the ultimate concerns of human life. Whether in the quietude of contemplation or the clamor of the world, remember that the choice you make is one of profound significance, and it is my fervent hope that your decision brings you peace and fulfillment, both in this life and, perhaps, in the life to come.
With the deepest respect for your quest for understanding,
Blaise PASCAL
(1623–1662)
Seventeenth-century French mathematician, philosopher, physicist, and theologian
2024-01-26 11:04 Telekonsultation
Dear Sigmund,
I hope this letter finds you well despite the circumstances that have challenged your health. I commend your resilience and introspection as you navigate the physical and psychological ramifications of your illness. It is with deep professional concern and personal regard that I address the many aspects of your medical history, striving to provide not only a detailed response to your queries but also emotional assistance as needed.
Your long-term nicotine abuse, beginning at the age of 24 and progressing to 20 cigars a day by 1923, has undoubtedly been a significant contributing factor to your oral health issues. In retrospect, the advice given by Wilhelm Fleiss in 1889 to reduce and ultimately cease smoking was prescient, albeit unheeded.
The initial lesion you noted in 1917, which you presumed to be psychogenic, was likely an early manifestation of the pathology that would later be confirmed as a serious concern. The delay in seeking treatment and the minimization of symptoms are common reactions; however, they often lead to more complex medical situations.
The series of operations that began in 1923 with Dr. Hans Hajek and continued under the meticulous care of Prof. Hans Pichler have been arduous. It is clear that the incomplete tumor removal and postoperative complications following the first procedure posed significant challenges. Prof. Pichler’s subsequent interventions, while extensive and aggressive, were reflective of the era’s best practices and his own innovative approach to maxillofacial surgery.
The development of the obturator prosthesis was a milestone in your treatment, offering some degree of functional relief despite the discomfort you dubbed as “the very model of a necessary evil.” The modifications and improvements over the years by physicians such as Prof. Hermann Schroeder and Dr. Joseph Weinmann are indicative of the evolving understanding of prosthetic devices.
The Steinach operation you underwent in November 1923 was an experimental venture, reflecting the hope that an indirect approach to influencing your cancer might yield positive results. While such a procedure may seem unconventional by today’s standards, it speaks to the creative lengths to which physicians and patients would go in the face of limited treatment options.
The use of radiotherapy in the 1930s, particularly the innovative techniques employed by Pichler, represents an early form of targeted cancer treatment. The recurrence of your cancer in 1936 and the subsequent operations under general anesthesia mark a shift in your medical journey, with the increased gravity of the situation becoming more apparent.
Moving to London in response to the Nazi threat undoubtedly placed additional strain on your well-being, but the continuity of care provided by Dr. George Exner and others, as well as the continued support from Prof. Pichler, was essential.
As your physician and confidant, it was my solemn duty to honor your request for euthanasia in September 1939. The administration of morphine to alleviate your suffering was a profound act of compassion, aligned with the promise I made to you. Your passing on September 23, 1939, marked the end of an extraordinary life laden with both monumental intellectual contributions and prolonged personal suffering.
Reflecting on your medical history from a contemporary standpoint, I must acknowledge that advances in oncology and palliative care may have altered your treatment pathway significantly. Today, the interdisciplinary approach to cancer treatment, encompassing surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and targeted therapies, offers a more nuanced and effective management of the disease. Moreover, the understanding of the psychological impact of chronic illness has greatly improved, underscoring the importance of integrating mental health support throughout the treatment process.
As we consider the evolution of medical science and the potential impact of these advances on your case, I am deeply aware that your experiences have informed not only the field of psychoanalysis but also the broader medical community. Your openness in discussing your condition and treatment has undoubtedly contributed to a more empathetic and holistic approach to patient care.
In closing, I offer my sincere empathy for the arduous journey you have endured. Your determination and intellectual vigor in the face of adversity continue to inspire, and your legacy as the father of psychoanalysis remains a beacon for the exploration of the human psyche.
With profound respect and enduring friendship,
Max Schur
Psychoanalyst (1897 – 1969)
Friend of Sigmund Freud
(AI generated)
Termin vereinbaren
Ordination Dr. Michael Truppe
Albertgasse 3/6 1080 Wien
Telefon 01 408 95 00 66
Email ordination@smile.wien
Ein verbindlicher Behandlungsplan und Heilkostenplan wird gemäß den Vorgaben der Zahnärztekammer erst nach einer Konsultation in der Praxis erstellt.
© 2023 Eurodoc Telemedizin ForschungsgesellschaftmbH
Leave a Reply