I need a second opinion about my palatinal ulcus

·

·

Given the historical context of the patient, Sigmund Freud, who has sadly passed away many years ago, I will provide a hypothetical analysis as if assessing a similar case today, based on the detailed medical history provided.

Summary of Patient’s Case:

The patient, with a significant history of heavy smoking, presented with a palatal lesion and underwent multiple treatments including surgical resections and radiotherapy for a recurrent cancer. The patient experienced considerable postoperative complications including trismus and difficulties with prosthetic obturation.

Initial Analysis:

Given the significant history of tobacco use and the presence of a palatal ulcer that responded to initial treatment but recurred, the following three initial differential diagnoses could be considered:

  1. Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the Oral Cavity: Considering the heavy smoking history and the appearance of an ulcer followed by recurrence after initial treatment, SCC is a primary consideration. Treatment would typically involve surgical excision with clear margins and possible adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy depending on the stage and resection margins.

  2. Necrotizing Sialometaplasia: This self-limiting benign condition can mimic malignancy and is often associated with local trauma or reduced blood supply to the affected area. Treatment is supportive, and the lesion often resolves by itself without invasive intervention.

  3. Deep Fungal Infection: In immunocompromised patients or those with significant systemic diseases, deep fungal infections like mucormycosis may present with palatal ulcers. Treatment involves antifungal medication and surgical debridement.

Differential Diagnosis:

Narrowing down the differential diagnosis, the most viable options given the patient’s history and the progression of the disease are:

  1. Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The patient’s heavy smoking history, the chronicity of the lesion, the recurrence, and the need for successive surgeries are highly suggestive of a malignant neoplasm such as SCC. This diagnosis is further supported by the histological findings in the subsequent surgeries and the need for radiotherapy.
  2. Osteoradionecrosis or Radiation-Induced Malignancy: Following radiotherapy, the patient could have developed osteoradionecrosis leading to non-healing ulcers. However, the relapse after so many years makes this less likely. Radiotherapy can also induce secondary malignancies, though the timeline in this case favors a primary cancer recurrence.

  3. Metastatic Disease: Given the palpable submandibular node, there’s a possibility of metastatic spread from a primary lesion elsewhere. However, there’s substantial evidence indicating the palatal lesion as the primary site.

Treatment Recommendation:

The most appropriate diagnosis for the patient, given the historical context, would appear to be Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity. The treatment that was administered aligns with what would be recommended today: surgical excision with clear margins, followed by reconstruction and adjuvant radiotherapy. The patient would also be advised to cease smoking immediately to decrease the risk of recurrence and improve treatment outcomes.

The prosthetic obturation, while problematic for the patient, was a necessary part of the rehabilitation process to allow for improved function and quality of life post-maxillectomy. Frequent modifications of the obturator would be anticipated as the surgical site healed and changed.

In current clinical practice, the treatment might also include targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or more advanced radiotherapy techniques like intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to minimize damage to surrounding tissues and improve outcomes. Additionally, cessation support for nicotine addiction and close surveillance for recurrence or secondary primary tumors would be recommended.

The challenges faced by the patient underline the importance of interdisciplinary care, involving oral and maxillofacial surgery, prosthodontics, oncology, and supportive care specialists, to manage complex cases of head and neck cancer effectively.

Secondary Options:

  • If malignancy had been ruled out, conservative management of a benign lesion like necrotizing sialometaplasia could be considered.
  • In the case of a deep fungal infection, antifungal therapy and surgical debridement would be the course of action.

Given the complexity of the case, employing the latest advancements in imaging, surgical techniques, and adjunctive therapies would provide the best chance for a favorable outcome.

Citations:
– Rivera C. (2015). Essentials of oral cancer. International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 8(9), 11884–11894.
– Neville BW, Day TA. (2002). Oral cancer and precancerous lesions. CA Cancer J Clin, 52(4):195-215.
– Jham BC, Reis PM, Miranda EL, et al. (2007). Oral health status of 207 head and neck cancer patients before, during and after radiotherapy. Clin Oral Investig, 11(1):19-24.

Signature:
Michael Truppe, MD

Termin vereinbaren

Ordination Dr. Michael Truppe
Albertgasse 3/6 1080 Wien

Telefon 01 408 95 00 66
Email ordination@smile.wien

Ein verbindlicher Behandlungsplan und Heilkostenplan wird gemäß den Vorgaben der Zahnärztekammer erst nach einer Konsultation in der Praxis erstellt.

© 2024 Eurodoc Telemedizin ForschungsgesellschaftmbH


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.