Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the spectra-pro domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/tm004217/watson.smile.wien/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
Frage nach Krankengeschichte - Virtual Patient System

Frage nach Krankengeschichte

·

·

The Virtual Patient Systems scans the medical history and the surgical report.

Frage Patient

Wer hat bei der Operation assistiert? Wie hoch war das Drehmoment beim Implantat?

Virtual Patient Antwort

Sehr geehrter Michael Truppe,
in Bezug auf Ihre Frage zum Assistenten und dem verwendeten Drehmoment bei der Operation, kann ich Ihnen folgende Informationen geben:
Assistent: Dina, Katarina
Verwendetes Drehmoment: 35 Ncm
Die Operation zur Platzierung des Zahnimplantats wurde erfolgreich durchgeführt und der Heilungsverlauf ist anhand der Likert-Skala-Werte sichtbar. Es gab einige Veränderungen im Laufe der Zeit, insbesondere in Bezug auf Schmerzen und Schwellungen nach der Operation. Am Anfang waren die Werte konstant bei 5, was auf minimale Beschwerden und Beeinträchtigungen hindeutet. Später sanken die Werte für Schmerzen und Schwellungen, was auf eine Verbesserung der Situation hindeutet. Schließlich erreichten die Werte 1, was auf eine nahezu vollständige Genesung hindeutet.
Bitte beachten Sie weiterhin die empfohlenen Nachsorgeanweisungen und vereinbaren Sie einen Termin für die endgültige prothetische Versorgung, sobald die Heilungszeit von 3-6 Monaten abgeschlossen ist.
Bei weiteren Fragen oder Bedenken wenden Sie sich bitte an uns.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Dr. Michael Truppe
Disclaimer DSGVO
Diese Antwort ist mit künstlicher Intelligenz im Rahmen eines Forschungsprojektes von Dr. Michael Truppe erstellt. Der Befund muss von Dr. Truppe erst bestätigt werden.
Ordination Dr. Michael Truppe
Albertgasse 3/6, 1080 Wien
Tel: +43 1 408 95 00 66
Email: cloud@smile.wien
Web: https://smile.wien
WhatsApp
Termin Telekonsultation

Surgical report used for the answer

Surgical Report

Patient ID: [TMJ] Date of Procedure: [13-06-2023] Surgeon: [Michael Truppe, MD] Assistant: [Dina, Katarina]

ImplantID: IMPL23ABC

Preoperative Diagnosis: Single missing tooth, #46 lower right first molar Postoperative Diagnosis: Single missing tooth, #46 lower right first molar Procedure Performed: Placement of dental implant using image-guided surgery

Indications: The patient presented with a missing lower right first molar (#46), with sufficient bone height and width. It was determined that the patient was an ideal candidate for a dental implant.

Procedure Details:

Preoperative Preparation: The patient was given oral hygiene instructions and premedication consisting of antibiotics (Amoxicillin 500mg) and anti-inflammatory medication (Ibuprofen 400mg). Written informed consent was obtained.

Anesthesia: Local anesthesia was administered with 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Profound anesthesia was achieved, and the surgical site was isolated with sterile drapes.

Incision and Flap Reflection: A crestal incision was made on the edentulous ridge at site #46. Full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap was reflected using a periosteal elevator to expose the underlying alveolar bone.

Image-Guided Surgery: Using CBCT images that were acquired prior to the surgery, the implant site was marked. The image guidance system, which was previously calibrated, was used to precisely place the pilot drill.

Osteotomy Preparation: Following the pre-planned path, sequential osteotomies were performed using increasing diameter drills as per the manufacturer’s guidelines. Irrigation with sterile saline was done throughout the process to prevent overheating. The final osteotomy matched the diameter and length of the chosen implant.

Implant Placement: A sterile packaged [ASTRA Prime Taper] implant of [4,2 mm] x [11 mm] was selected. The implant was placed into the osteotomy site using a torque wrench until the implant platform was flush with the alveolar bone crest. A torque of 35 Ncm was achieved indicating good primary stability.

Closure: A healing abutment was connected to the implant. The mucoperiosteal flap was repositioned and sutured using resorbable sutures. A sterile dressing was placed over the surgical site.

Postoperative Imaging: Postoperative radiographs were taken to confirm the correct placement of the implant in relation to neighboring structures and to serve as a baseline for future evaluations.

Postoperative Instructions and Follow-Up: The patient was given postoperative instructions, a prescription for antibiotics, and analgesics, and an appointment was set for suture removal and follow-up in one week.

Surgeon’s Comments: The patient tolerated the procedure well. The surgical site will be allowed to heal for 3-6 months before a final prosthetic restoration will be placed.

This report is a true and accurate record of the procedure performed.

Surgeon Signature: [Michael Truppe, MD] Date and Time: [13-06-2023 5 PM]


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.